Company
Profiles

Executive
Compensation Issues

Executive Compensation
Database

Executive Employment
Law Issues

Corporate
Governance

Executive
Ethics

Executive
Discussion Forums

 ExecuCite Blogger
 Articles
 Legal Cases
 Glossary
 Additional Resources
 Bookshelf
 International
 Custom Research













// Main Site / Member's Area / Company Profiles / 1st Constitution Bancorp / COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT 2006

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT 2006

New Page 18

Board Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, consisting entirely of independent directors, is responsible for establishing and overseeing policies governing annual and long-term compensation and benefits for the executive officers and other members of senior management of the Company and the Bank. The Compensation Committee approves compensation levels and the Board of Directors ratifies their recommendations. The Compensation Committee’s specific responsibilities include:

  • reviewing the Company’s and the Bank’s general compensation and benefits policies, plans and programs, including incentive compensation program and equity-based plans;
     
  • reviewing and approving goals and objectives relevant to the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation and the compensation of the other senior management;
     
  • based on an evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer’s performance, both in relation to those goals and objectives and in leading the Company, determining the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation level; and
     
  • upon the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer, reviewing the base salary, incentive compensation and equity-based compensation of the other members of senior management.

The overall objectives of the Company’s executive compensation program are to attract and retain the highest quality executives to manage and lead the Company, and to provide annual and long term incentives to management, based on both Company performance and individual performance, in order to build and sustain value for shareholders.

Compensation decisions for the Company’s named executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, for the 2005 fiscal year were reviewed and determined by the Compensation Committee.

The Company’s executive compensation program for fiscal 2005 was reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee. A compensation consultant was retained by the Compensation Committee to assist in reviewing competitive compensation programs for the Company in connection with the Company’s senior officers, including the Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officer as well as other members of the management group. The Compensation Committee may consider organizations that differ from the banking organizations included in the industry group because, in the view of the Compensation Committee and its compensation consultant, the companies in the index are not necessarily the most representative group for purposes of determining competitive compensation pay practices for the senior executives. The Compensation Committee regularly reviews the competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation practices.

Annual Base Salary. Annual base salaries for the named executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, are reviewed annually based upon survey data and increases through fiscal 2005 made by the Compensation Committee are based on appropriate competitive annual base salary levels for such executives. Actual total remuneration levels may range below or above target in any one year and over a period of years based on performance against annual and long-term goals as well as market price of the Company’s shares.

23


Stock Based and Long Term Incentive Compensation. The Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee are of the view that stock ownership or its equivalent by management aligns the interest of management with the Company’s shareholders. Stock options are granted at fair market value and are intended to align executive compensation opportunities with shareholder returns. Stock options and awards granted during fiscal 2005 were part of the Compensation Committee’s customary annual review and these grants were made at levels which the Compensation Committee determined to be appropriate long term equity-based incentives to such executives. In determining the specific levels of individual stock option and awards for fiscal 2005 for the Company’s executive officers, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee considered and weighed a number of factors, including the duties and responsibilities of the officer in question, the performance of the Company and of the particular officer in 2005, the performance anticipated from the officer in 2005 and future years and certain competitive factors.

Chief Executive Officer Compensation. Mr. Mangano’s base salary for 2005 was established by the Compensation Committee following and based on a performance review for 2005 conducted by the Compensation Committee. His annual incentive compensation award as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table was based on the Compensation Committee’s review of the net earnings performance of the Company against target goals. Mr. Mangano’s stock award was based on the Compensation Committee’s consideration of the factors discussed above. The Compensation Committee determined that each element and the aggregate of Mr. Mangano’s compensation for 2005 were fair and reasonable and within the range of compensation for chief executive officers of companies comparable to the Company.

The Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Mangano as of August 22, 1999 (the “Former Agreement”). The Former Agreement had an original term of three (3) years with the provision for annual extensions at each anniversary. The Compensation Committee determined to evaluate the terms and conditions of the Former Agreement in light of current compensation practices, the performance of Mr. Mangano as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 1999 and the growing size and complexity of the Company.

In connection with this review, the Compensation Committee retained the services of an independent compensation consultant to review a number of issues with respect to Mr. Mangano’s compensation arrangements, including cash and non-cash components of his compensation, the term of the employment agreement, termination of employment benefits with and without a change of control of the Company, without “cause” termination by the Company and “good reason” termination by Mr. Mangano, gross-ups by the Company of benefit payments subject to Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code which imposes a federal excise tax on “golden parachute payments,” and contract benefit reductions as a result of the application of Section 162(m) of the Code which makes non-deductible for tax purposes by the Company certain payments by the Company in excess of $1,000,000 to an employee as compensation. On the basis of the advice of the compensation consultant, legal counsel and its own assessments, the Compensation Committee negotiated a new employment agreement with Mr. Mangano which the Company and Mr. Mangano executed on February 22, 2005.

The Compensation Committee believes the revised employment agreement is reasonable in light of current compensation arrangements prevailing among enterprises with which it competes for persons serving as chief executive officer, Mr. Mangano’s past performance as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the past performance of the Company under his leadership as Chief Executive Officer.

SERP. Since 2002, the Company has had in effect a supplemental executive retirement program (“SERP”). The SERP is intended to provide a retirement benefit for the participants. Currently, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Senior Vice President and Treasurer are the only participants, although one or more future participants could be added to the SERP by future action of the Compensation Committee.

24


Compliance With Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally allows a deduction to publicly traded companies for certain qualifying performance-based compensation. Section 162(m) disallows a deduction to the extent certain non-performance based compensation over $1 million paid to the Chief Executive Officer or to any other named executive officer. The Company believes that Section 162(m) deduction limits for fiscal 2005 will not be applicable or, if applicable, would not be material in terms of net financial effect. Therefore the Company does not intend to seek to change any fiscal 2005 compensation arrangements. The Company and the Compensation Committee will continue to monitor this matter.

Conclusion. The Compensation Committee believes that the compensation provided to the Company’s executive officers is reasonable and appropriate. The Compensation Committee also believes that such compensation is structured to promote high levels of individual and Company performance and to create the appropriate alignment among individual achievement, Company financial performance and the interests of the Company’s shareholders.

Compensation Committee

FRANK E. WALSH, III (Chair)
CHARLES S. CROW, III
WILLIAM M. RUE
 

25

-- Proxy Statement April 2006