New Page 2
BOARD
OF DIRECTORS REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
NOTWITHSTANDING
ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY SET FORTH IN ANY OF THE COMPANY’S PREVIOUS OR
FUTURE FILINGS UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 THAT MIGHT INCORPORATE BY REFERENCE THIS INFORMATION STATEMENT, IN
WHOLE OR IN PART, THE FOLLOWING REPORT AND THE PERFORMANCE GRAPH WHICH FOLLOWS
SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY SUCH FILINGS.
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The
Board of Directory has responsibility for, among other things, establishing,
reviewing and monitoring compensation of the Company’s officers. The
Company’s named executive officers are: Michael L. Bowlin,
President and Chief Executive Officer and President and Nina J. Pratz, Chief
Financial Officer and Senior Vice President. The Company does not
have a compensation committee. Instead, the entire Board of
Directors functions with the same responsibilities typically given a
compensation committee.
Compensation
Philosophy and Objectives
The
Board of Directors is responsible for setting and administering the
Company’s policies regarding annual compensation. In general the
Board of Directors compensation philosophies are based upon the following
subjective principles:
|
|
-
|
Compensation
programs should reflect and promote the Company’s goals and reward
individuals for contributions to the Company’s success in
achieving its goals.
|
|
|
-
|
Compensation
should be related to the value created for the Company and its
stockholders.
|
|
|
-
|
Compensation
programs should integrate both the long and short term strategies of
the Company.
|
|
|
-
|
Compensation
programs should be designed to attract and retain key executives
critical to the long-term success of the Company.
|
Total
compensation for senior management is set at levels that the Board of
Directors believes are competitive in relation to companies of similar type
and size; however the Board of Directors has conducted no independent
investigation of such levels. Components of executive compensation include
base salary and a discretionary bonus program. Executive officers
who are also directors have not participated in deliberations or decisions
involving their own compensation.
Responsibility
for Compensation Decisions
The
Board of Directors makes all decisions regarding the compensation of Mr.
Bowlin and Ms. Pratz. The Board reviews their performance annually. The
Board has not proposed an increase in Mr. Bowlin’s or Ms. Pratz’s salary
for several years, although the Board does use bonuses to compensate Mr.
Bowlin and Ms. Pratz (see “Elements of Executive Compensation, Bonus
Compensation” for further information). The Board does not
expect that their base salaries will materially change in the next year.
The
Board does not use a written policy for compensation but has operated under an
informal policy that the market value of the Company’s stock will not be
considered in the compensation of any executive officer.
While
the Board has general knowledge of its industry, it does not use compensation
consultants or surveys of competitor or industry compensation to set
compensation for its named executive officers.
Base
Salaries
The
Board of Directors establishes base salaries for the Company’s executive
officers at levels considered appropriate in light of the duties and scope of
responsibilities of each officer’s positions. In this regard, the
Board considers the compensation practices and corporate financial performance
of similarly situated companies. The Board of Directors takes into
account a number of factors, including, but not limited to, management’s
efforts to improve levels of sales and profitability and to expand markets
into which the Company’s products are distributed and sold. The
Board also considers management’s consistent commitment to the long-term
success of the Company through developing and implementing strategic business
acquisition opportunities.
Based
upon its evaluation of these factors, the Board of Directors believes that
senior management is dedicated to achieving long-term financial improvements,
and that the compensation policies, plans and programs administered by the
Board contribute to management’s commitment. The Board of
Directors attempts to assimilate all of the foregoing factors when it renders
its compensation decision; however, the Board recognizes that its decisions
are subjective in nature due to the subjective criteria on which such decision
are based. The Board of Directors does not assign any specified weight to the
criteria it considers.
Bonus
Compensation
Bonus
compensation is paid at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Determination
of the Board of Directors with regard to the award of bonus compensation are
generally based upon the Board’s evaluation of the same factors previously
described above under “Base Salaries” and other subjective criteria.
Other
Compensation
Mr.
Bowlin and Ms. Pratz do participate in other benefits such as matching
contributions to 401(k), term life, auto and disability insurance policies and
a car allowance. The Company’s Board of Directors determines the
amount of the Company’s 401(k) match. The Board believes that
such benefits are appropriate to compensate Mr. Bowlin and Ms. Pratz in lieu
of paying them higher salaries.
-- Proxy Statement August 2007