Company
Profiles

Executive
Compensation Issues

Executive Compensation
Database

Executive Employment
Law Issues

Corporate
Governance

Executive
Ethics

Executive
Discussion Forums

 ExecuCite Blogger
 Articles
 Legal Cases
 Glossary
 Additional Resources
 Bookshelf
 International
 Custom Research














Legal Cases

  Annual Compensation
Go
  Articles
Go
  Change In Control Agreements
Go
  Contract Negotiation & Contract Terms
Go
  Executive Perquisites
Go
  Long Term Pay
Go
  Negotiation Without A Contract
Go
  Reg_13D
Go
  Regulatory Materials
Go
  Rule 144 Selling Restricted and Control Securities
Go
  Section 16(b)
Go
  Severance Negotiation
Go
  Short Term Incentive Pay
Go
  • Ackerberg v. Johnson
    Court held that seller of unregistered securities was entitled to Rule 144 exemption, because he was neither an "issuer", "underwriter" or "dealer".
  • SEC v. Cavanagh
    Court upheld district court's judgment that defendants violated Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 by selling and offering to sell unregistered securities, not exempted under Rule 144.
  • SEC v. Lybrand
    Court held in favor of the SEC. "In sum, dendants' transactions fall squarely within the ambit of Section 5 and are not entitled to exemption pursuant to Section 4(1) or Rule 144."
  • SEC v. Ralston Purina Co.
    In this seminal Supreme Court opinion, the Court established the precedent for complying with the Securities Act of 1933 reguiring the registration of securities and full disclosure to the public regarding private placement of securities.