Company
Profiles
 Executive
Compensation Issues
 Executive Compensation
Database
 Executive Employment
Law Issues
 Corporate
Governance
 Executive
Ethics
 Executive
Discussion Forums
 ExecuCite Blogger
 Articles
 Legal Cases
 Glossary
 Additional Resources
 Bookshelf
 International
 Custom Research













// Main Site / Member's Area / Executive Employment Law Issues / Disability Discrimination / Legal Cases

Legal Cases

Executive Employment Law Issues
Subcomponent Folders
  Age Discrimination
Go
  Breach of Employment Agreement
Go
  Confidentiality Agreements
Go
  Constructive Discharge Termination
Go
  Covenant of Good Faith And Fair Dealing
Go
  Defamation
Go
  Disability Discrimination
Go
  Emotional Distress
Go
  Employee Stock Ownership Plans
Go
  Equal Pay Discrimination
Go
  Family Medical Leave
Go
  Fraud Claims
Go
  Freedom Of Speech
Go
  Long Term Disability Benefits
Go
  National Origin Discrimination
Go
  Negligent Misrepresentation
Go
  NonCompetition Agreements
Go
  Non-Solicitation Agreements
Go
  Oral Contracts
Go
  Overtime Pay Exemption
Go
  Pension Benefits
Go
  Pregnancy Discrimination
Go
  Racial Discrimination
Go
  Religious Discrimination
Go
  Retaliation Discrimination
Go
  Sarbanes Oxley Whistle Blowing Claims
Go
  Sex And Gender Discrimination
Go
  Short Term Disability Benefits
Go
  • Murphy v United Parcel Service Inc
    Employee sued employer for disability discrimination pursuant to the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). The Court held in favor of employer and stated that employee did not meet the threshold requirement that she be substantially limited in a major life activity due to the fact her disability could be mitigated by medication.
  • Toyota Motor Manufacturing v. Williams
    Employee sued employer pursuant to the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). The Court held in favor of employer. This case is important because the Court defined what is meant by the phrase "substantially impaired in a major life activity."
  • US Airways Inc. v. Barnett
    Employee requested a reasonable accommodation for his disability. The Court held in favor of the employer. This case was important, because the Court further defined what is meant by the phrase "reasonable accommodation" pursuant to the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).